Blogroll Policy And Organisation Of Links
I got started on looking at other blogs by checking out the blogrolls on the blogs I liked and then commenting on the blogs which appealed to me and I recognise that others do much the same thing. So I try to include only blogs in my blogroll which I get value out of or I just like and/or find myself checking on and/or commenting on, on a regular basis.
Your blog has been up and running for at least 3 months (this is because of the number of blogs which 'curl up and die' during the first 3 months. You post on a regular basis (this certainly doesn't have to be daily but once a week or once a month doesn't make my blogroll. Before I include a blog I subscribe to it and then watch/read it for a while.
This is mainly to check out the preceding point and to see whether or not I like it or think it adds value and want to keep reading it. I like reading as well as looking - good narrative works for me everytime! Humour is good when natural and observant rather than forced and constructed.
We all get annoyed/irritated from time to time and everybody is entitled to a whinge but if your blog turns into a whingefest you'll find that I start to ignore it and eventually exclude it. I don't have to like or approve of everything posted on the blogs that I blogroll for a variety of reasons but I usually do.
I favour blogs which remember proper attribution and I dislike blogs which don't. A blogroll can make life easier for me when I'm checking out other blogs, however I mainly do this using blog feeds and Bloglines. I've got more blogs on my Bloglines blogroll than I have on this blog. All the links to other resources have been reinstated - but in my new Squidoo Lens rather than the right hand column of this blog. New ones are also being added here.
Look what happens to fish which get hooked on particular compounds which affect their brain chemistry in negative ways for them. Both tiger nuts and peanuts can affect carp health and healthy nutrient intake, when eaten in virtual exclusion of other foods in certain fishing waters. Like us humans, fish have evolved to be extremely efficient at extracting energy from the most available foods in our natural environment. The fishs entire body, ability to move, the eyes, digestive system and chemoreception mechanisms etc have all been extremely highly evolved and tuned for this purpose.
Attempting to replicate live natural food factors such as amino acid profiles, vitamin and mineral content, live enzymes, proteins and lipids etc, will still not deliver to fish the same energy values of natural food. The energy field of such a bait will be utterly different too. In some aspects of aquaculture, fish are not even fed artificially, but are left to feed on the natural algae and other beneficial factors as results of correct sediment preparation and water characteristics in a raising pond.
So many reactions involve using energy to digest and assimilate the food ingested, with boilies and pellets no matter how much they are ‘digestible and pre-treated with enzymes, they may still provide less energy than natural food after assimilation. No bait has been discovered that truly solves the limiting effects of bait ingredients; the nitrogen and amino acids requirements and limiting effects of these artificial foods. But this is obviously just the tip of the iceberg of important factors in baits to be taken very consistently over time.
For example, fish like humans are very much composed of water and minerals. Perhaps the impact of minerals in baits and live food (including plant material) are far more significant regarding biological energy supply and electrical field type food detection than we yet know. Perhaps certain ingredients that improve the fishs ability to detect food item energy fields is more significant an edge than is currently realized.
